Introduction and Historical Review
Context
Ad hoc Strategies
Theoretical Background
Learning from Ad hoc Architecture
Reference
Ad hoc Strategies in Urban Ecology
Architecture of the everyday
Hanoi Urban Ecologies
Hanoi housing typologies
Henri Lefebvre’s Critic of Everyday Life
Housing System
Marchel Duchamp’s Inframince
Michel de Certeau
Natural System
Robert Venturi and Ordinary Architecture
Rojo Kansatsu Gakkai
Self-organization
System Theory
Urban System
Vernacular Architecture and Ad hoc phenomenon
Ad hoc Architecture
The housing problem of Hanoi shares its similarity with other emerging cities in the region of South East Asia as well as other locations throughout Latin America and Africa, in its conflict between formal and informal developments as well as its absorption of different colonized cultures. Yet, it is different from those cities in that the different ideologies are not as clear-cut and are not isolated in separate segments of the city. Instead, the city has exposed a great dynamic mixture of different foreign ideologies with the indigenous culture in its urban morphology (Geertman, 2007). This unique symbiosis, however, is in danger of being broken because of the unprecedented increase of urban population.
Timeline
From now to 2050, Vietnam’s urban population will increase at the rate of 1 million people per year. As the conventional top-down urban planning strategy has proved its impotence in dealing with urban growth, combined with increasing evidence that informal housing clusters provide better energy consumption per capita, communication and urban amenities for low-income households, bottom-up, self-organizing housing strategies need to be considered. If the spontaneously built structures are synchronized with city planning and in tandem with the requirement systems of nature, then the future of cleaner, smarter energy use in cities could be secured. This hypothesis will be carried out by synthesizing energy consumption of housing units, thus helping to estimate the energy input needed. Understanding the nature of expansion units, associated with people’s lifestyles and preferences for spatial settings is imperative for inventing new strategies for designing expanded space. The prospective future of this speculation is to turn rigid planning methodologies into parametric, mutable processes, where citizens have freedom to create their own space according to new design guidelines of “kit of parts,” and at the same time eases the urban concern of safety, hygiene and infrastructural burden. Moreover, turning the design from plan to process implies a better relationship between clients, designers, and contractors, where the role between them can be shifted and framed in a mass customization of the building industry.